Hannah O'Hara

Hey Kirsten,
I always find it weird when big fashion companies make ethical mistakes, it involves children. I remember when H&M had that scandal with the monkey shirt being put on the black child, while the white children in the ads didn’t have any animal clothes. I think Balenciaga’s choice to include children with teddy bears wearing their latest BDSM line is very weird. It’s a cross mix of two worlds that shouldn’t be colliding: BDSM (and possibly sex) and small children.

I’ve been seeing tweets online claiming the fashion company is condoning pedophila and is secretly involved with a child-eating cult. I think social listening and seeing how best they can move forward while taking responsibility will be important for Balenciaga. They need to show they are not aligned with the abuse and mistreatment of children. Claiming to not know about the set designer’s choice to include actual court documents that are obviously shown in ads that have to be approved is a bad statement. Suing the set designer is a step in the right direction, but more needs to be done so children are put or portrayed in adult-themed situations. I will definitely be looking out to see what statement Balenciaga puts out next.

Hey Kirsten,

When I heard about the Balenciaga scandal, I couldn’t believe how something like that could happen when there are so many rounds of approval (or how it could even happen at all) for a launch like this – at least there should be.

Things spread so fast on the internet, especially when it involves a big-name designer brand that is already in the spotlight all the time and represented by the world’s biggest celebrities. 

I think a lot of the time, brands don’t address things fast enough because they have too many people involved, especially legal processes to make sure they’re not breaking any contracts or anything else that they need to protect themselves of. 

As a result, the responses from these brands always sound formulaic and inauthentic. Even so, I’m sure people will continue to support this brand and their atrociously expensive products!

Hey Andrew great read. Even though it would be an inconvenience to people if apple took twitter off of their platform, the app has so much Market share and usage that people would overcome the inconvenience and people would still use the app in the same capacity.

Hey Andrew,
I think it would be fair for Apple to remove Twitter from the App Store. The app has gotten away from its traditional platform of “free” speech to a playground for a bored billionaire. One thing about Apple, they’re going to protect their reputation, no matter what. There’s a few issues Twitter’s new takeover poses that aren’t being received very well. The main one being the price of account verification: $8 (or other amounts) gets your account verified whether you’re legit or not. For starters, in-app purchases aren’t something Twitter users are accustomed to and I don’t think that’ll change. Apple is known for allowing and transparently communicating in-app purchases, so users are aware upfront. Apple is a brand known for consistency, Twitter is a state of change and transformation. It’ll be interesting to see if the two continue a partnership of sorts or not.

Hey Andrew,

I had always wondered what the process for getting apps into the App Store was like. Because how do I know that whatever I’m downloading is safe? It makes me feel better that there is an intensive process to get approved.

I also didn’t know that Apple takes a percentage of in-app purchases, but that makes total sense to me. Since they are the means that an app I collecting revenue, they should get a portion of that.

Although I agree that it wouldn’t be very good for Twitter to get kicked off of the App Store, it’s good to know that if the app strayed too far and was doing harm that it can be less accessible through the control Apple has over the App Store.

Hey Andrew,

Hearing about all the things Elon wants to do with Twitter definitely intrigues me. His idea of encouraging users to pay $8 per month in an effort to get rid of bots might be a game changer in the social media world if it turns out to work. Maybe some day in the future we will all be paying monthly for our social channels.

Hey Andrew!
This was a great post. I’m a big Disney fan, and honestly, cheered when I found out Chapek was out. I agree that it’s unlikely that Apple will purchase Disney. It just doesn’t make sense, the companies are too different and it would add a lot of new facets to manage within Apple, like the Disney parks, etc. Even with their similarities, like tech software and show/film production, their portfolios are too massive to merge. I think everyone is wary considering Musk’s purchase of Twitter. It will be interesting to see how Disney and Apple continue competing in areas where they’re similar, though.

Hey Andrew, great read.
I agree, I don’t think buying Apple makes sense for business. If Disney were to buy apple, it would be like a power move showing off all the money they have. But they have plenty of money to fund their own products and become successful in any business venture they want to pursue in.

Alexis- such an interesting article. This is the first I am hearing of “Trivia Quest”, and it sounds so interesting! I know you also mentioned “Bandersnatch”, but this reminded me of “Black Mirror” and how they integrated interactive TV into their shows. Though for “Black Mirror” they did a lot of publicity and posting about it, for this seemingly more interactive TV show and I haven’t heard anything about it, weird! I think that the mobile aspect of this show is really cool, but I can see where the difficulties will show through. Honestly, making interactivity only work with the Netflix App is such a smart idea, of course, it makes everyone download their app, and I’m sure Netflix saw a huge jump in downloads. This makes me want to try it! I’ll report back if I have any difficulties. 😉

Hi Alexis,

Thanks for sharing this article. I haven’t heard of Trivia Quest or Triviaverse. I haven’t even really been aware of any interactive programs on Netflix besides the Black Mirror one (I think) from a few years ago. I think its cool that Netflix is branching out into gaming, which makes sense as a next product line. But it sounds like there are still a bunch of kinks they need to work out before it is widely adopted. I would also guess that they’ll need to do a better job of marketing this because I’m sure not many are trying it out.

Hi Alexis! Nice article, I had no idea Netflix was trying to create a trivia-based game. Based on your description it sounds like a great idea to incorporate the double screens that many already are using (consuming tiktok on a phone while watching a TV show on a TV). I am wondering how Netflix can overcome the glitches in the technology to make this a smooth integrative process. The process itself is reminding me of Kahoot, a mobile trivia game made for learning purposes. They have their technology down to a science! Each child in a classroom connects to the classroom code and compete in trivia made by the teacher. I’m wondering if this is the direction Netflix is planning to take with the idea.

Hey Alexis!

Great post. I have yet to play it. I remember playing Trivia Crack in college . Now I’ll have to give it a try and see if they’ve improved the user’s experience. When reading your post about Netflix’s Trivia Quest it immediately reminded me of the Black Mirror interactive episode. Netflix has been playing with the idea of interactive experiences for a decent amount of time. I’d imagine the gamification of each of these platforms will only increase. Additionally, this is a great way to have users engage with the Netflix mobile app. Unless I’m on a plane, I NEVER open the Netflix app. However, as you said – it needs a few improvements.

Hey Alexis, Great Read.
I have not heard or played this game before but it is unfortunate the game has many bugs and glitches. I am not a fan of using like a mobile application to play games off a different screen so maybe If they can address that problem, the game might have better success. But the game itself does not sound like a bad idea!

Hi Alexis, surprisingly I have played Trivia Quest before! I was really bored one weekend and saw it pop up on my Netflix and started playing for about 30 minutes. I haven’t played since.

Hey Arpana! This was such a comprehensive and interesting post. I completely agree that your organization doesn’t seem to need an app right now. I can’t think of a business or company I know well that doesn’t have an app off the top of my head. However, my current company does not have one and I think it’s the right choice. I work for a very small HR-based media company, so developing an app would require either new hires or outsourcing, just to start the process. We put out a lot of content, but it is all email or web-optimized, so there’s no real reason for us to have an app. Similar to your experience, my company’s demographic doesn’t quite fit: it’s mostly HR or company leaders that consume the content during work, not during their free time. Our website and magazine were recently mobile-optimized and email marketing can be consumed on their respective apps. An app for our business would further blur the line between work and personal life balance, I think. Great post!

Thanks for this post, Arpana — there is a temptation, I think, for every company to think they need an app — Even in the non-profit theater world, a few years ago, a conglomerate of Philadelphia theaters got together to create an app that they thought would drive revenue. After some significant expense, the result was low adoption. No one needed to app to purchase tickets or learn about shows, so the software was soon put to rest. As we’ve discussed in class, (and was captured in our reading) it’s essential to know the goal of tech adoption and that it will solve a problem and create enough impact for people to actually want to use it. Just you wait — soon every company will “NEED” augmented reality for something

I for one have a love/hate relationship with Uber. I prefer to use the ridesharing app way more than others, but I hate how shady it is so this is no surprise that they have eradicated their points system. I was not aware of this transition, nor did I even know how many points I racked up. Ultimately, I believe this was a good decision for Uber because I’m sure there was nothing to gain by giving customers points to use in leu of monetary transactions. However, it seems as if it has already angered their consumer base, something that might make some chose lyft the next time they need a ride. I for one swear by Philadelphia’s public transit system and would rather walk then pay 20 dollars for an 8 minute ride!

Hi Samara,

Thank you for sharing this because I didn’t even notice that I no longer have Uber rewards on my Uber account. Once I read this post, I went straight to my phone and checked on it and noticed that the rewards tab is now gone. I have the Uber one program, but I always ignored it. I had over 30,000 points so I am kind of upset about this! If I knew it was going away, I would of used those points! I am in a similar living situation as you. I use uber anywhere between 5-10 times a week. I am sure many other customers that are city living are also outraged by this news! Uber one seems like Uber’s way to still get us to get discounts (even though its $10 a month, so it is really discounted?”. I am interested to see how they will handle this backlash. I can see this decision hurting them in the future. Many people, myself included, used those rewards to cheapen our rides. Now if I want a discount, I have to pay $10 a month? That is a no from this customer.

I haven’t lived in the city since college, so I haven’t used Uber as frequently as I used to, so I wasn’t aware at all of this switch. I don’t like the subscription roads that so many companies and apps are taking. It actually makes me not want to use the app at all and just switch to Lyft. I was not aware of the shift, but I’m sure Uber handled the change well, but I just don’t think that people are taking the news well, and neither am I. I definitely think that the social media backlash is going to create some issues for Uber because when I am looking something up about a company I tend to turn to social media to learn about them, so I’m assuming that others do the same too. I think this subscription addition will ultimately hurt Uber, and drive users to other apps instead of Uber.

Interesting read, Samara! While not an avid UBER ride, I wasn’t aware of this (and, admittedly, have no clue how many points I have!). From your perspective, I would be frustrated. Instead of wiping those points, I think they should have at least allowed you to use what you’ve banked first. I’m also not fond of the paying for points model. Previously, you had an incentive to use UBER over other ride sharing app (you pay for your ride or order delivery through UBER Eats and, in turn, you earn points). Having to pay for this subscription on top of the transaction doesn’t appear fruitful for the customer.

Hey Samara, Great read.
I use uber a lot when I go on business trips but I was not aware of this change. I can imagine many users are upset and angry that they made changes. They handles their shift in business model poorly as they should had notified their consumers better. I do not think this change will affect them financial as I can assume they own the majority of market share but it is a bad example for smaller companies to follow.

Hi Samara, I hadn’t heard that they were getting rid of their rewards program either. I wouldn’t be surprised if they purposely didn’t market this as well as they could. Definitely would have been a down quarter had everyone used all their rewards.